Why does Pat hate Hugo?
One thing that has not been very clear to me is why Pat Robertson called for the assassination of Hugo Chávez. I think that it is interesting that his reasoning is ignored, even as he is method is condemed by all sides. What the hell was he thinking? In his on-air "apology”, he stated some reasons that might hold some water.
“If you look back just a few years, there was a popular coup that overthrew him[Chavez]; and what did the United States State Department do about it? Virtually nothing; and as a result, within about 48 hours, that coup was broken, Chavez was back in power. But we had a chance to move in. He has destroyed the Venezuelan economy, and he’s going to make that a launching pad for communist infiltration and Muslim extremism all over the continent. I don’t know about this doctrine of assassination, but if he thinks we’re trying to assassinate him, I think we really ought to go ahead and do it. It’s a whole lot cheaper than starting a war, and I don’t think any oil shipments will stop. But this man is a terrific danger, and this is in our sphere of influence, so we can’t let this happen.” -Pat Robertson
Strong words from a man that made a deal with Mobutu Sese Seko a few years back. What's the matter Pat, lost your taste for dealing with dictators?
Makes me wonder what Pat's interests (or potential interests) are in
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home